Rick Franchuk wrote:
... > > > > I'm not surprised. More NIH.
....... > been developed for (NIH or no, I don't think there's a team of coders out
....... > made. NIH would be the least factor in such a decision, if considered at all.
...... > > > It's rather presumptuous to assume that someone succumbs to NIH whenever they
....... > > I don't. I only assume NIH when I see someone duplicate another
.......... > "I'm not suprised. More NIH."
.......
Can anyone explain what do National Institutes of Health have to do
with writing source code? Your statements seem to be illogical.
VanLUG Email Archive