Ya`akov N. Miles (ynmiles@ibm.net)
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 01:03:33 -0800
Kevin Chu wrote:
>
> Jay Thorne wrote:
>
> > Here's a note for the list: You don't have a _real_ backup until you've
> > tried to recover a file off your tapes or done a verify. Its not a backup
> > until you can read it....
>
> For what it's worth, I've restored files off my backups, to undo user
> errors. And, BRU does a complete verify after every backup. That, and
> there is some sort of error checking inherent in the way the data is
> written onto the tape (I think), that makes BRU better than tar. Or,
> that's what EST would have you believe. Anyway, BRU has an easy to
> use GUI. :)
>
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin Chu kevin@portal.ca
> http://members.tripod.com/~super_kevin/
I should correct you. BRU does NOT do a proper verify by default, it does
an "autoscan" which involves reading the entire tape into the NULL device
and looking for errors. It does NOT do a bit-by-bit comparison of the tape
with the original media (unless you specifically ask it to)...
-- Linux - it isn't just for breakfast anymore... mailto:ynmiles@ibm.net Note http://www.cheapbytes.com for (almost) free Linux & freeBSD CD-ROMs and http://www.mit.edu/afs/sipb/user/xiphmont/cdparanoia for CD ripper also http://www.happyhacker.org/hwgstart.html - Enjoy...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 24 Feb 1999 - 01:00:48 PST